tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4398707586267015404.post1375429893362112904..comments2012-10-19T01:11:23.328-07:00Comments on ^self life asString: Dynamic bindings vs. laziness in ClojureAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06545992408287952857noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4398707586267015404.post-18871698093722805152012-10-19T01:11:23.328-07:002012-10-19T01:11:23.328-07:00Same is true for elisp ;) lexical-bind to the resc...Same is true for elisp ;) lexical-bind to the rescue. Anyway, for certain problems dynamic scope is much more convenient, e.g. when using buffer-bound modes in emacs that determine certain behaviors / state. In that sense dynamic layer activation in COP is similarly used.Robert Krahnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03637918472245916289noreply@blogger.com